Should the government support artists or should artists support themselves as imagination and origination serve as twin towers in art, artists should be relatively free and out of control from the government. Ielts writing task 2/ ielts essay: you should spend about 40 minutes on this task some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources discuss both views and give your own opinion. And we do people read books, attend movies and plays, go to museums and concerts, and enjoy the arts in various other ways that don’t involve government subsidies what i don’t understand is why more people in the various arts communities don’t regard government support as corrupting.
Government assistance to artists by jhonson (malaysia) some people believe that the government should provide financial assistance to all artists including painters, musicians and poets others think that it is a waste of money. The government should not subsidize the arts, because the arts are a private enterprise the government should not subsidize the arts, because the arts are a private enterprise artists survived quite well during the renaissance, without government subsidy, and they could survive just as well today.
Some people agree that the government should offer help for artists, while some insist that the artists themselves should earn their own livings based on my personal experience and observation of life, i agree that the government should support the artists first of all, art is essential to most, if not all, people. Essay topics: should the government support artists or should the artists support themselves submitted by bennyjstai on fri, 03/07/2014 - 04:56 when it comes to whether artists should be supported by themselves or by the government, people often possess different perspectives. Should the government support artists or should artists support themselves essay topics: should the government support artists or should artists support themselves submitted by vicholas on thu, 12/05/2013 - 06:45.
People have a varied opinion whether the government should assist a financial support to the artists or not however, while it is true that the government should help artists, i would argue that spending money on artists is not a waste of money it is often said that art forms are an integral part of the nation's cultural heritage. To enable artists to share their gifts and talents and to contribute to the betterment of the community, government support of artists should ensure that we never have to live in a dull, colorless, and shapeless world. Growth of a country in general, means development in all aspects of the societyit is the duty of the government to support people in each and every sector which in turn includes artists alsoon the other hand ,it is also argued that,government has to look out other urgent and basic needs such as housing, food etc , reather that spending money on encouraging artistic worksin this essay ,i would like to discuss few points for and against regarding the expenditure for the department of arts.
Should the government fund art 81% say yes 19% say no i want to sex sex is a good thing the not-for-profit arts create $37 billion in economic activity and support 13 million jobs (american arts alliance) i really don't think that we need to pay artists word count word count word count word count word count word count posted by. The government should definitely support the arts, by providing funding for public museums and concert venues art is something that will last forever, and will act as a window to our time for future generations. Should governments support artists and the arts topic rating: 4 means development in all aspects of the societyit is the duty of the government to support people in each and every sector which in turn includes artists alsoon the other hand ,it is also argued that,government has to look out other urgent and basic needs such as housing. I think that artists, musicians, actors, etc should be supported by the government in some way to get them started and to support their career i also think that they should be able to support themselves in case their career backfires.
Government officials who are in charge of control and orientation of people's life should admit the fact that art and artists are the fundamental blocks of a prosper society therefore, they should realize that how financial support contributes to the art existence and then how art can boost the civilization progress. Their unique gift as artists is to remind us of our common humanity with every note, brushstroke, word or gesture, they transcend all artificial barriers of nationality, race and religion doubling down on the artist as truth-teller is the single most important thing the nea can and should be doing.
Whether the government should provide financial assistance to the country’s artists is an often debated topic some people believe that the government should help artists others think that spending money on artists is akin to wasting the nation’s wealth.